Newt Gingrich, former speaker to the House, is written in the books and the importance of the United States gave speeches, and he supported high speed research Atlanta, high-speed line in Riga, Latvia, Tenn., requested by local boosters, when he was Congress. .Gov Rick Perry of Texas saw his failed 175 billion dollars, the transport plan to build what is called the Trans-Texas corridor high-speed role.
Representative Ron Paul of Texas, a small up-government libertarian, signed a letter that several members of Texas ' U.s. delegation be sent to the Federal officials contacted the State money in 2009 in rail transport studies to help it build a "really ambitious and world-class high-speed network."
But Mr. Gingrich may be most outspoken Republican presidential candidate, when it comes to his aid high-speed. He has spoken and written in France and China, and how far the admiringly forward, they were, when the United States, it will be high-speed. He is a burden on the high-speed lines in the sense in Florida and California — to place the Obama administration tried to build it — and in conjunction with the Northeast. And he has spoken to the role of the Government to help build the national railway network.
"If you want to be the most competitive country in 2040, or 2050, you need to think big," Mr. Gingrich said 2009 videotaped the Governors of the national central banks in forum sponsored by the Association and the building of America in the future, the infrastructure advocacy group. Mr. Gingrich great idea was the United States of America to build a high-speed magnetic field levitation trains, because China is a.
"Now and really bold and go head with the development and implementation of maglev trains, which transmits the 280, 300, 320 miles per hour in China," Gingrich said in his speech, which Mr. Streetsblog.org transport Web site wrote about recently. "And you change all of a sudden all sorts of information about how this country is working equations."
Before the rail transport policy was the account ID over the last few years, rates of Republican support is not unusual. Recently, in 2004, the Republican Guard party platform stated that "Republicans support, if economically viable, the development of high-speed passenger railroad system as a tool for economic development and enhanced mobility."
But rail transport policy changed significantly after Mr. Obama convinced Democrats Congress include 8 billion u.s. dollars of passenger rail and high-speed his 787 billion dollar stimulus plan.
States originally competed fiercely money, but that the tonne-kilometres after the 2010 midterm elections, Republicans swept by the Congress and many statehouses. The new Governors of Ohio and Wisconsin Republican hundreds of millions of dollars was rejected by the Federal Republic of Germany, the aid which the States won their passenger-rail systems to build up to.
Then who won 2.4 billion dollars of federal money to build the nation's first True high-speed network between Orlando and Tampa, Florida after the money sent back to the new Republican Governor Rick Scott, said, is a boondoggle. Republicans Congress have since denied Obama administration requests more expenditure on the railway.
Against this background, it is a good idea to some rail traffic, it was some Republican said at the "Innocence" is to support high-speed history hopeful mark. "I hope that we can move in the process of partisan behavior speeds past — it was certainly not always this way," said Petra Todorovich, America 2050, the regional plan Association, an independent branch of research and advocacy group in the cities. "Even though politicians may vary depending on the design and management of both sides of the aisle on the speeds of the politicians in the United States, which this is recognized by the it makes sense to have certain corridors."
Spokesmen for Mr. Gingrich and Mr. Perry did not respond to e-mail messages, make their views known, rail traffic from seeking comment. But Mr. Gingrich outlined their views on the 2008 paper, "Real change: From the world that fails to the World that Works" by saying that California, Florida and the Northeast corridor from Boston to Washington are all "very favourable this type of high-speed investment."
But he will take a different tack, Obama administration, and many Democrats, arguing that the development of rail transport in the Union work rules, "stymied" Amtrak, Washington politicians, who authorities an unprofitable routes, inefficiency and the "regulations and disputes involved in the large-scale construction in the United States."
Mr. Paul spokesman Jesse Benton said, via email, and that Mr. Paul "thinks rates is a very interesting idea and can be very valuable for the project, in many cases."
Mr. Benton, said that Mr. Paul believed that ideally should be left to the high-speed development of the private sector, but that he, by, on behalf of the federal tax rebates and shall be withdrawn in accordance with the regulations of its development. He said that Mr. Paul signed other 2009 Texas-the members of the delegation of the Federal — letters with which sought to raise money for the research, which it said would help "to attract high-quality private and public sector investors, which can be made, the key to the success of the large number of" — was intended to ensure that "a fair share of the money was spent in Texas to Texan taxpayers received some of their money back." In that letter announced the first in the Newsweek article in October about fiscal policy of the conservative party for their chips on the Federal Government.
But the rail projects will continue to be tough with the sell-to customer, many conservatives these days, such as Mr. Gingrich Hinted his 2009 remarks, Governors ' Forum. "Let me just close with I think is a central issue, that I am ready to debate both the Liberals and the Conservatives, but probably I'm a little more value with the v?ittelev?t of the conservative party," he said, speaking of the need to amend the federal funding process. "You cannot talk about the fundamental rights of the American national security in the long term without this country economically. redevelopment aid It is not possible. And competitive American economy without dramatically more reliable and modern infrastructure, it is not possible to talk about. "
No comments:
Post a Comment